1. MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated\n4 Feb 2005<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance not granted\nas it is proved that wife wants to reside separately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2. MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated Apr\n2008.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance not granted\nas it is proved no reason to leave husbands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
3. CHENNAI HIGH COURT : Dated 21\nJune 2002<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance Denied<\/p>\n\n\n\n
4. CHENNAI HIGH COURT : Dated 21\nFeb 2003<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Maintenance For\nWorking Women<\/p>\n\n\n\n
5. MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT : Dated 24\nMarch 2000<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Interim\/Maintenance\nfor Capable, Working Women<\/p>\n\n\n\n
6. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 28 July 2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
She was earning and she\nhad not come to the Court with clean hands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
7. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 22 Feb 2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Wife Troubled -No\nMaintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
8. SUPREME COURT : Dated 23 March, 2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SC Judgement on HMA24 –\nWife working no maintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
9. HIGH COURT OF P & H<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance awarded in\ntwo sections to be offset<\/p>\n\n\n\n
10. HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Old Parents, Maintenance\nreduced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
11. MUMBAI HIGH COURT: Dated 22 February, 2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perjury in 125 crPc<\/p>\n\n\n\n
12. MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Madhuri Bai vs\nMinor Surendra Kumar And Anr. on 24 April, 1998<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Child can claim\nmaintenance u\/s 125 from mother<\/p>\n\n\n\n
13. MADRAS HIGH COURT: S.Chandra vs\nC.V.Sridharan on 21 February 2007<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Claim alimony within 6\nMonths of Divorce<\/p>\n\n\n\n
14. DELHI HIGH COURT: Sanjay Bhardwaj &\nOrs. vs The State & Anr. on 27 August, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Unemployed man can not be forced to pay Maintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
15. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Ines Miranda vs\nSantosh K Swamy dated 14 december 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
TRANSFER PETITION \u2013\nPayment to Husband
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
16. MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated 17 July,\n1991<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Same relief\n(maintenance)cannot be asked twice in two different courts <\/p>\n\n\n\n
17. DELHI COURT : METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NEW\nDELHI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vexatious petition,\nmaintenance,relief is declined <\/p>\n\n\n\n
18. BOMBAY HIGH COURT : Dated 14 March\n2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perjury Judgement :\nRigorous imprisonment for False Case<\/p>\n\n\n\n
19. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (CENTRAL)TIS\nHAZARI COURTS, DELHI: Dated 15 April 2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance claim based\non Affidavit dismissed<\/p>\n\n\n\n
20. PUNJAB – HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated \n17 February 2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance claim based\non Affidavit dismissed<\/p>\n\n\n\n
21. DELHI HIGH COURT<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Husband Property Not\nCounted in Maintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
22. HIGH COURT OF P & H : \nDated 28 July 1961<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance not based on\nArthmetic Calculation<\/p>\n\n\n\n
23. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 1\nSeptember, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Claim of high status of\nhusband not sufficient for interim maintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
24. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 30\nAugust, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Multiple Maintenance\npetitions are not allowed<\/p>\n\n\n\n
25. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Reduced Intrim\nMaintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
26. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated \n11 June, 1993<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Maintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
27. MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated 18\nJuly, 2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Maintenance to Wife if\nRCR By Husband Suicceed<\/p>\n\n\n\n
28. MUMBAI HIGH COURT<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Permanent Alimoney\nCancelled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
29. MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Income Tax and\nMaintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
30. MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 18 November 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Income tax returns cannt\ndecide Maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
31. MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Dated 29 August\n1991<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Challenging the rejected\ninterim maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
32. PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated 25\nJanuary, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
False affidavit, perjury\nprocedure in 24 HMA <\/p>\n\n\n\n
33. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 7 September\n2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Divorce withdrawn \u2013\nMaintance to be paid<\/p>\n\n\n\n
34. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 16 November 2004<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Father In Law not\nresponsible for Residence<\/p>\n\n\n\n
35. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: Dated 22 September,\n1992<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Women to Prove ligitimacy\nof child for maintenance<\/p>\n\n\n\n
36. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bank Account Details and\nconfidentiality <\/p>\n\n\n\n
37. BOMBAY HIGH COURT: Dated 15 September,\n2004<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Return of\nStridhan,Alimony and Hidding Past<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
38. GAUHATI HIGH COURT: Dated 23 April,\n2004<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Guardianship within 2\nMonths <\/p>\n\n\n\n
39. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 9 March,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fine for Delaying tactics\nby Lawyer <\/p>\n\n\n\n
40. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Central Information\nCommission – CIC Order in Passport Details<\/p>\n\n\n\n
41. UTTARANCHAL HIGH COURT : Dated25 October\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Maintenance u\/s125Crpc\nfor working Women<\/p>\n\n\n\n
42. UTTARANCHAL HIGH COURT : Dated \n18November,2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Maintenance u\/s Crpc\n125 if wife deserts husband<\/p>\n\n\n\n
43. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 22\nSeptember, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance formula\nevolved by judges for wife and child \u2013 PWDVA<\/p>\n\n\n\n
44. MADRAS HIGH COURT: Dated 20 November\n2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mother is not always\nright person for custody<\/p>\n\n\n\n
45. SUPREME COURT: Dated 2 March 2001<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rules for Child Custody<\/p>\n\n\n\n
46. SUPREME COURT: Dated 23 March 2004<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Illegitimacy of child is\nnot with Family court<\/p>\n\n\n\n
47. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 10 September\n2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No maintenance to Capable\nwife<\/p>\n\n\n\n
48. MADRAS HIGH COURT: Dated 4 November\n2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Husband has to prove his\nEarning<\/p>\n\n\n\n
49. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Dated 5 June\n2007<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Section 125\nCr.P.C.Proceedings under are civil in nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
50. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 15\nDecember, 2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Wife has no Right on\nMonther in Law’s Property <\/p>\n\n\n\n
51. KERALA HIGH COURT : Dated 10 December,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kerla HC accepts the easy\nmisuse of DV<\/p>\n\n\n\n
52. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Dated 9\nNovember, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Double jeopardy applies\nto same offence, not same facts<\/p>\n\n\n\n
53. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 29 July,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Family members of NRI\nhusband cannot be accused in DV case <\/p>\n\n\n\n
54. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 18\nSeptember, 2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No maintenance to earning\nspouse <\/p>\n\n\n\n
55. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 10\nJanuary, 2003<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alimony can be granted\neven to an erring spouse <\/p>\n\n\n\n
56.PUNJAB-HARYANA HIGH COURT : Dated 23\nSeptember, 2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
False case and Damage<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
57. ROHINI COURT – DELHI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
False Dv and Women Failed\nto Prove it<\/p>\n\n\n\n
58. ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE NEW DELHI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Domestic Violence to be\nProved<\/p>\n\n\n\n
59. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/p>\n\n\n\n
3rd Party Passport\nDetails are Allowed<\/p>\n\n\n\n
60. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 4\nNovember, 1997<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas Corpus for Custody\nand Visitation<\/p>\n\n\n\n
61. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 25 October,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner must claim she\nis unable to maintain herself for relief of maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
62. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 25\nMarch, 1976<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner must claim she\nis unable to maintain herself for relief of maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
63. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 13 February,\n1980<\/p>\n\n\n\n
She should prove that she\nis unable to maintain herself in addition to\nthe facts that her husband has sufficient means<\/p>\n\n\n\n
to maintain her and that\nhe has neglected to maintain her <\/p>\n\n\n\n
64. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 22\nAugust, 2005<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No maintenance for\nearning wife<\/p>\n\n\n\n
65. DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI :\nDated 18 Nov 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Employable wife not\nentitled to maintenance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
66. DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI : Dated 24\nMarch 2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An NRI wins an interim\nmaintenance case<\/p>\n\n\n\n
67. FAMILY COURT , HYDERABAD<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Hyderabad Family court,\nunclean hands, no maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
68. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 17 April\n2007<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Conditions when\nmaintenance to be paid<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
69. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 11\nJanuary, 2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All State Amendments in\nSec. 125 are invalid <\/p>\n\n\n\n
70. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 17\nFebruary, 2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas Corpus for girl\nchild custody to Father <\/p>\n\n\n\n
71. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 28 April,\n2005<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas Corpus dismissed\nin Custody Appeal <\/p>\n\n\n\n
72. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 21\nNovember, 2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Custody to reMarried\nwomen <\/p>\n\n\n\n
73. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 25 January, 2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas Corpus on Custody\nto Father <\/p>\n\n\n\n
74. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 6 February, 2006<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas Corpus for Custody\non Death <\/p>\n\n\n\n
75. KERALA HIGH COURT : Dated December,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
NBW cannot be issued for\nnon payment of maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
76. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/p>\n\n\n\n
CIC \u2013 Income Tax Details\nof FIL are public <\/p>\n\n\n\n
77. UTTARANCHAl HIGH COURT : Dated 17\nMarch, 2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n
HC Quash Maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
78. MUMBAI HIGH COURT :Dated 13\nSeptember, 1995<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No multiple maintenance\nclaims<\/p>\n\n\n\n
79. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 9\nOctober, 1985<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Magistrate can grant\ninterim maintenance ?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
81. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 16\nFebruary, 2000<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas Corpus in Custody <\/p>\n\n\n\n
82. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 27 March,\n2007<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Habeas Corpus in Divorce\n\/ Custody Petition <\/p>\n\n\n\n
83.SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 17\nOctober, 1974<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Separate income of the\nwife can be taken into account in determining the amount of maintenance payable\nto her <\/p>\n\n\n\n
84. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 31 January,\n2003<\/p>\n\n\n\n
HMA moveable property can\nnot be termed as Income <\/p>\n\n\n\n
85. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 18\nSeptember, 2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance On Actual\nEarnings<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
86. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 30\nSeptember, 2008<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Parents can kickout their\nChildren<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
87. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 28 March,\n2000<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Liability of maintenance\nof children is co-extensive<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
88. GUJRAT HIGH COURT : Dated on 21 October\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Multiple maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
89. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 12 October,\n2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DV can be filed anywhere <\/p>\n\n\n\n
90. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 28\nOctober, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Magistrate should not\nblindly call all family members as respondents <\/p>\n\n\n\n
91. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 4 October,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DVA only against who are\nin domestic relationship
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
92. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 20\nSeptember, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
How to decide domestic\nrelationship in DVA <\/p>\n\n\n\n
93. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 8 February,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Frivolous petition\nclaiming damages dismissed <\/p>\n\n\n\n
94. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 7 January,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance, Women fined,\nContempt of Court <\/p>\n\n\n\n
95. ANDHRA HIGH COURT : Dated 15\nNovember, 1995<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance to\nillegitimate Child ? <\/p>\n\n\n\n
96. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/p>\n\n\n\n
RTI \u2013 Husband can get\nWife PF details<\/p>\n\n\n\n
97. ANDHRA HIGH COURT : Dated 31 March,\n1989<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maintenance arrears for 1\nyear only ! <\/p>\n\n\n\n
98. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 6\nDecember, 2005<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fine for forcibly taking\naway Child <\/p>\n\n\n\n
99. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 28\nFebruary, 2007<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Family Court Jurisdiction<\/p>\n\n\n\n
100. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 2\nMarch 2000<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Wife is not entitled to\nmaintenance who has deserted her husband,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
101. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 03\nDecember 2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No Maintenance If Wife\nLies <\/p>\n\n\n\n
102. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 28\nApril 2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Take EMI Into\nCosideration in Maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
103. HIGH COURT OF STATE OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\nAT CHANDIGARH : Dated 13 March 2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No alimony to Women who\ndesert her husband <\/p>\n\n\n\n
104. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 23\nFebruary, 2009<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Interim maint increase\nillegal as no income proof produced <\/p>\n\n\n\n
105. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Interim maint amt shuld\nbe based on status of both part <\/p>\n\n\n\n
106. CHATTISGARAH HIGH COURT : Dated 15\nFebruary, 2004<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No maintenance for a\ndeserting wife <\/p>\n\n\n\n
107. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT: Dated 22 January,\n1999<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No maintenance for a\ndeserting wife <\/p>\n\n\n\n
108. BOMBAY HIGH COURT : Dated 26 February,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Interim maintenance\ncannot be increased based on husband’s salary hike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
109. GUJARAT HIGH COURT : Dated 9 February,\n2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Childrens has to maintain\nparents. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
110. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July\n2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Meaning of unable to\nmaintain <\/p>\n\n\n\n
111. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 27\nNovember 2007<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Unable to maintain\nherself in Maintenance <\/p>\n\n\n\n
112. DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE DELHI :\nDated 28th August 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Landmark Judgement for DV\nCase
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
113. CHENNAI HIGH COURT : Dated 26th August\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perjury Case <\/p>\n\n\n\n
114. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 19 January,\n2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Wife fined 10,000\/- in\nPerjury case but Husband fighting for further action!! <\/p>\n\n\n\n
115. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 18 August, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Every allegations do not\njustify initiation of prosecution under 340 CRPC <\/p>\n\n\n\n
116. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 15 March,\n2001<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petition under CrPC 340\nmust be decided only at the end <\/p>\n\n\n\n
117. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 09 Janurary\n2003<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perjury application must\nbe decided first before proceeding with the case <\/p>\n\n\n\n
118. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 14\nNovember, 1994<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No one should indulge in\nimmoral acts like perjury, prevarication and motivated falsehoods : 2 weeks\nJail <\/p>\n\n\n\n
119. GUJARAT HIGH COURT : Dated 18\nAugust, 2010<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner aggreed for\nperjury \u2013 Gujrat HC told to deposit 25K as probable fine <\/p>\n\n\n\n
120. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 1\nDecember, 2010SC judgement in CrPC 340\nwrt Chartered Accountants Act<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
1. MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated 4 Feb 2005 Maintenance not granted as it is proved that wife wants to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,28],"tags":[267,18],"class_list":["post-334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-maharashtra","category-news-and-updates","tag-divorce","tag-mumbai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=334"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":335,"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334\/revisions\/335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gurukulgalaxy.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}